Ghana stands at a pivotal moment in its history. As the nation continues to redefine its identity and strive for progress, it is time to confront a legacy that many believe continues to undermine the country’s potential. Accra’s premier gateway, currently known as Kotoka International Airport, bears a name that evokes a past of betrayal and discord. Lieutenant General Emmanuel Kwasi Kotoka played a key role in the 1966 coup that overthrew Ghana’s first President, Kwame Nkrumah—a leader widely revered for his vision of pan-African unity and progressive self-determination. To many, Kotoka’s actions represent a betrayal that set Ghana on a path of political instability and curtailed the nation’s forward momentum. It is precisely this association that calls for the airport’s renaming, as a powerful symbol of reclaiming our national dignity and charting a future unburdened by the mistakes of the past.
For decades, the name Kotoka has been a constant reminder of a turbulent period in Ghana’s post-independence history. Nkrumah’s dream of an empowered and unified Africa was sharply interrupted by a coup that many view as having plunged the nation into years of military rule and economic hardship. By keeping Kotoka’s name on such a prominent national landmark, Ghana risks perpetuating the memory of actions that many citizens believe continue to harm the nation’s collective psyche. Renaming the airport, therefore, is not a mere exercise in rebranding; it is a profound act of national self-assertion. It represents a decisive break from a past that is widely seen as contrary to the values of unity, progress, and justice that modern Ghana aspires to embody.
The argument for renaming is built on three principal pillars: historical accountability, the reshaping of public identity, and the fostering of national unity. First, historical accountability demands that we acknowledge and address past wrongs. The 1966 coup not only disrupted the democratic and developmental aspirations of Ghana but also led to years of governance by military and undemocratic regimes. By honouring a figure whose actions are synonymous with political betrayal, we risk legitimising a dark chapter in our history. An airport, as a gateway to our country, should instead celebrate those who have contributed positively to Ghana’s progress. Reclaiming our history in this manner is a vital step toward healing old wounds and correcting the historical narrative.
Second, reshaping public identity through renaming is essential. National symbols play a crucial role in defining who we are as a people. The name of an airport, seen by millions of visitors and citizens alike, carries immense symbolic weight. It is often the first impression of Ghana for travellers and business partners from around the world. A name that continues to remind us of treachery is incongruent with our ambitions of unity, prosperity, and global respect. By choosing a new name—one that reflects our true values and celebrates leaders who have unambiguously championed the welfare of our nation—we send a clear message: Ghana is determined to move forward and to honour a legacy that truly benefits all its citizens.
Third, fostering national unity is at the heart of this proposal. Ghana is a nation rich in culture and diversity, yet divided by the echoes of past conflicts. The process of renaming can act as a unifying project that engages all sectors of society. It is an opportunity for a collective national dialogue, where historians, community leaders, and citizens come together to reimagine our heritage. This process, conducted through comprehensive public consultations and inclusive debates, can help bridge generational and regional divides, ultimately creating a symbol that everyone can stand behind.
Critics may contend that renaming an airport is a superficial gesture that merely attempts to erase a difficult past. However, renaming is not about denying history—it is about reinterpreting it in a way that aligns with the nation’s current values and future aspirations. History is not static; as society evolves, so too must the symbols that represent it. Ghana has already redefined its narrative by honouring visionary leaders like Kwame Nkrumah. In a similar spirit, a new name for our international gateway would not erase the past but rather provide a more fitting tribute to the principles of freedom, unity, and progress that should guide our national discourse.
To convince citizens of the urgency to rename the airport, an unconventional approach must be employed—one that blends thoughtful historical analysis with innovative public engagement. Instead of relying solely on traditional media and political speeches, this campaign should utilise interactive digital platforms, community forums, and creative storytelling to present a compelling narrative. Imagine an online platform where Ghanaians can explore a dynamic timeline of our history, replete with archival images, personal testimonials, and interactive maps that illustrate the long-term impacts of colonial interference and the 1966 coup. Through this immersive experience, citizens can see for themselves the stark contrast between the ideals of Nkrumah’s vision and the divisive legacy of Kotoka’s actions. Such an approach, while unconventional in its delivery, will ensure that the message resonates deeply with all segments of society—from academic scholars to everyday citizens.
Moreover, this initiative should incorporate community-based events across the nation, inviting citizens to participate in discussions, art installations, and creative workshops that explore what the new airport name should represent. These events would not only educate the public about the historical context but also allow them to express their hopes and visions for Ghana’s future. In doing so, the renaming campaign becomes a grassroots movement—a collective effort to redefine our national identity and reject symbols that no longer serve the common good.
Renaming the airport is not an attempt to rewrite history but to set the record straight by honouring those who have genuinely contributed to the nation’s development. It is a decisive act of reclaiming our heritage, one that sends a resounding message: Ghana is determined to move forward with a sense of integrity and unity, free from the burden of a past marked by betrayal.
In conclusion, the call to rename Kotoka International Airport is a vital step towards reclaiming Ghana’s true legacy. By replacing a name associated with treachery with one that reflects our shared values of unity, justice, and progress, we can pave the way for a brighter, more cohesive future. This proposal is not merely about a change of name—it is about healing, accountability, and national renewal. Let us embrace this opportunity to redefine what our national symbols stand for and to inspire every Ghanaian to take pride in our rich, complex heritage, ensuring that the future we build is one that honours our past while striving for true excellence and unity.